Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Thomas Gagne <tgagne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 08:11:18 -0500
topmind wrote:
Is it required to be implemented the same way as done on paper? Or isHow does the law require denormalized data?
one merely required to present it in double-entry form (which is just a
presentation issue)? It seems foolish to have laws that force
denormalized data.
--
Visit <http://blogs.instreamfinancial.com/anything.php> to read my rants on technology and the finance industry.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: topmind
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- Prev by Date: Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy
- Next by Date: Re: Databases as objects
- Previous by thread: avoid cast to derived
- Next by thread: Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|