Re: Databases as objects
- From: "topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Dec 2006 08:59:50 -0800
Patrick May wrote:
"topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Mr. May likes nitty side-tracks to distract from the real issue.
Yes, I am rather fond of "nitty side-tracks" such as providing
evidence for one's claims. I can see how that would distract from
your "real issue" of spewing errant nonsense. Darn me. Darn me to
heck.
Look who's talkin'. Where's the objective evidence that OO is better
for biz apps? Huh huh huh? That's all that REEEEALLY matters but you
ain't got no game on that court.
It is not my burden to show otherwise. The difference between paradigms
and techniques is considered equal or unknown until proven otherwise.
OOP appears to be a bunch of flap-trap for expensive consultants to
suck deep-pocket suckers dry.
Sincerely,
Patrick
-t-
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- References:
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: S Perryman
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- Prev by Date: Re: Databases as objects
- Next by Date: Re: avoid cast to derived
- Previous by thread: Re: Databases as objects
- Next by thread: Re: Databases as objects
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|