Re: Databases as objects

"topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Patrick May wrote:
Yes, I am rather fond of "nitty side-tracks" such as providing
evidence for one's claims. I can see how that would distract from
your "real issue" of spewing errant nonsense. Darn me. Darn me to
heck.
[ . . .]
It is not my burden to show otherwise.

When you make positive claims, as you so often do in this
newsgroup, the burden of proof is indeed yours. You consistently fail
to meet this burden, typically retreating to "I was just voicing my
subjective opinion." when pushed hard enough.

Perhaps people will devote the effort to providing evidence to
you when you demonstrate the intellectual integrity and common
courtesy of supporting your claims.

Sincerely,

Patrick

------------------------------------------------------------------------
S P Engineering, Inc. | Large scale, mission-critical, distributed OO
| systems design and implementation.
pjm@xxxxxxx | (C++, Java, Common Lisp, Jini, middleware, SOA)
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Databases as objects
    ... I am rather fond of "nitty side-tracks" such as providing ... evidence for one's claims. ... Darn me to ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Databases as objects
    ... I can see how that would distract from ... Darn me to ... Where's the objective evidence that OO is better ... Huh huh huh? ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Databases as objects
    ... evidence for one's claims. ... I can see how that would distract from ... your "real issue" of spewing errant nonsense. ... Darn me to ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Lispnik logo
    ... >> Darn, the urls was supposed to be ... >This is for Scheme. ... Common Lisp should have #' in front of it. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Is DEFCONSTANT broken?
    ... Madhu wrote: ... Either you do not understand Common Lisp at all, ... have evidence of reincarnation.... ... Barry Margolin, barmar@xxxxxxxxxxxx ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)