Re: Databases as objects

S Perryman wrote:
topmind wrote:


I am only saying I don't challenge that domain.

1. No you are not. You stated :

"You guys often imply OO is Liquid Jesus, but offer ZERO evidence
outside of systems software."

That means people *have offered evidence* in that domain.

No, it does not. Saying, "There is no X outside of Y" is NOT the same
as claiming there is X inside of Y. You have committed a logical
fallacy. An IT professional should know that.



2. Why do you not "challenge" that domain ??


Because I have insufficient experience in that domain. More specificly,
I cannot evaluate claims of change frequencies, which is a common theme
in these kinds of debates. If somebody says change A is more likely
than change B, I don't have the experience to question it and explain
in detail why it may be the other way around.



Regards,
Steven Perryman


-T-

.