Re: Databases as objects
- From: "topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Dec 2006 12:41:36 -0800
S Perryman wrote:
topmind wrote:
Sorry, but if someone claims that I cannot provide information to
support my position, when I have it to hand, I don't consider it "too
minor a point to bother" .
I did give evidence. It is just not lawyer-tight. Is every statement
you make lawyer-tight? Can you provide objective evidence of every
statement you make? You never give anecdotal evidence? Again, a double
standard.
With all the time you have wasted on comp.object over the years, I
contend that you would have all the time necessary to "show
objective evidence" .
I don't consider it all "wasted", only you do because you hate me and
think I am Satan's evil brother.
Perhaps people will devote the effort to providing evidence to
you when you demonstrate the intellectual integrity and common
courtesy of supporting your claims.
Don't lecture me about "common curtesy" and "intellectual integrity".
You guys often imply OO is Liquid Jesus, but offer ZERO evidence
outside of systems software. Hyp-O-Crate.
What "evidence" (greater than zero) has been offered *inside* of
"systems software" ... ??
I am only saying I don't challenge that domain. People keep using
examples from sys software, but the biz domain needs solutions also. I
don't care if OO is grand for systems software. We bizzers want to see
it making life better in the biz domain.
Regards,
Steven Perryman
-T-
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: S Perryman
- Re: Databases as objects
- References:
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: S Perryman
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: S Perryman
- Re: Databases as objects
- Prev by Date: Re: Databases as objects
- Next by Date: Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- Previous by thread: Re: Databases as objects
- Next by thread: Re: Databases as objects
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|