Re: Databases as objects
- From: S Perryman <q@xxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:19:14 +0000
topmind wrote:
Patrick May wrote:
TM>It is not my burden to show otherwise.
When you make positive claims, as you so often do in this
newsgroup, the burden of proof is indeed yours. You consistently fail
to meet this burden, typically retreating to "I was just voicing my
subjective opinion." when pushed hard enough.
Because it ain't worth it to persue. With enough time in many cases I
could show objective evidence, but then I decide it is too minor a
point to matter.
Sorry, but if someone claims that I cannot provide information to
support my position, when I have it to hand, I don't consider it "too
minor a point to bother" .
With all the time you have wasted on comp.object over the years, I
contend that you would have all the time necessary to "show
objective evidence" .
> If that bothers you, then take drugs.
A poor attempt IMHO to evade the charge that you don't have the
facts to support your claims.
Perhaps people will devote the effort to providing evidence to
you when you demonstrate the intellectual integrity and common
courtesy of supporting your claims.
Don't lecture me about "common curtesy" and "intellectual integrity".
You guys often imply OO is Liquid Jesus, but offer ZERO evidence
outside of systems software. Hyp-O-Crate.
What "evidence" (greater than zero) has been offered *inside* of
"systems software" ... ??
Regards,
Steven Perryman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- References:
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: S Perryman
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- Prev by Date: Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- Next by Date: Re: Databases as objects
- Previous by thread: Re: Databases as objects
- Next by thread: Re: Databases as objects
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|