Re: Databases as objects
- From: S Perryman <q@xxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 21:31:30 +0000
topmind wrote:
S Perryman wrote:
Sorry, but if someone claims that I cannot provide information to
support my position, when I have it to hand, I don't consider it "too
minor a point to bother" .
I did give evidence.
Have I missed something ??
It is just not lawyer-tight. Is every statement
you make lawyer-tight? Can you provide objective evidence of every
statement you make?
For which I claim to have objective information for: yes.
You never give anecdotal evidence? Again, a double standard.
No double standard at all.
When I speak from experience, I say so.
When I speak from fact, I say so.
With all the time you have wasted on comp.object over the years, I
contend that you would have all the time necessary to "show
objective evidence" .
I don't consider it all "wasted"
Of course not (by definition) .
only you do because
You appear incapable of constructing decent examples to discuss your
claims that cannot or have not already been refuted by OO. And have no
discernable real-world experience with OO to support your claims.
And not because ...
you hate me and think I am Satan's evil brother.
TM>Don't lecture me about "common curtesy" and "intellectual integrity".
TM>You guys often imply OO is Liquid Jesus, but offer ZERO evidence
TM>outside of systems software. Hyp-O-Crate.
What "evidence" (greater than zero) has been offered *inside* of
"systems software" ... ??
I am only saying I don't challenge that domain.
1. No you are not. You stated :
"You guys often imply OO is Liquid Jesus, but offer ZERO evidence
outside of systems software."
That means people *have offered evidence* in that domain.
2. Why do you not "challenge" that domain ??
Regards,
Steven Perryman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- References:
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: S Perryman
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: S Perryman
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- Prev by Date: Re: Databases as objects
- Next by Date: Re: avoid cast to derived
- Previous by thread: Re: Databases as objects
- Next by thread: Re: Databases as objects
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|