use case <<include>> vs. <<generalize>>
- From: idob@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 28 Dec 2006 01:23:10 -0800
Hi I would like to have your opinion about the following:
I design the use case "Process File".
There are 3 situations of processing the file:
- scan and process
- browse and process
- get mail attachment and process.
What is the best way to describe it in use case model?:
- Use case "Process", in the uc, script with 3 options?
or
- Three use cases: "scan file" "browse" "mail" with <<include>>
relation to 4th use case "Process"?
or
- One use case "Process", with <<generalize>> relation to the 3 use
cases "scan","browse","mail"?
Thank you.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: use case <<include>> vs. <<generalize>>
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: use case <<include>> vs. <<generalize>>
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: use case <<include>> vs. <<generalize>>
- From: Mark Woyna
- Re: use case <<include>> vs. <<generalize>>
- Prev by Date: Re: Databases as objects
- Next by Date: Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- Previous by thread: Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- Next by thread: Re: use case <<include>> vs. <<generalize>>
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|