Re: Databases as objects

On 27 Dec 2006 14:51:10 -0800, topmind wrote:

Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
On 26 Dec 2006 09:08:02 -0800, topmind wrote:

If I say "There is no
evidence that unicorns exist", you cannot ask for an example.

No, we can immediately discard this statement as illegal. "There is no"
must be applied to an observable set. You can say "In Britanica there is no
evidences that unicorns exist." Then we could go and verify that.
Otherwise, it is always your burden to prove a universally quantified
statement. For example by showing that existing unicorns would necessarily
post in comp.object within each hour.

Is this better?:

Definitely, google groups tracks comp.object. So we could take a one day
record and verify existence of unicorns with regard of existence
comp.object and google.

Nobody here on comp.object has presented such evidence.

We just don't need it, because see above. Misspelled sentences are ignored
on syntax reasons. No evidences or proofs required.

--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
.