Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: "topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Dec 2006 13:05:54 -0800
Thomas Gagne wrote:
topmind wrote:
Thomas Gagne wrote:Think of it as:
I've written multiple financial OLTP systems and can confidently say
there's no such thing as "john bill 5".
A transaction system must be able to record:
Check for $10.
Cash for $20.
Deposit to checking $15.
Payment to line-of-credit: $15.
These are 4 *separate* transactions, aren't they? It is still:
A, B, 10.00
C, D, 20.00
E, F, 15.00
G, H, 15.00
A: $10
B: $20
C: $15
D: $15
What are the letters here? In my example, they were account codes, such
as "cash", "accounts payable", etc.
Where the letters are the various account categories/codes (unspecifiedThe example, "john bill 5" was moving $5 from john to bill ( or the
here). It is still a form of "john bill 5".
reverse--it's hard to tell ).
Every individualThat is incorrect. The sum of debits and credits = $0. They aren't
accounting transaction has to debit and credit 2 accounts. Traditional
accounting would do the above like this:
necessarily symmetric--they just cancel each other out.
Isn't it: A = L + E rather than "= 0"? Summing to zero is not enough.
(Some account combinations are not permitted, to ensure this.)
--
Visit <http://blogs.instreamfinancial.com/anything.php>
to read my rants on technology and the finance industry.
-T-
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Thomas Gagne
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- References:
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Thomas Gagne
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: topmind
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Thomas Gagne
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Doc O'Leary
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Thomas Gagne
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: topmind
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Thomas Gagne
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- Prev by Date: Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- Next by Date: Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- Previous by thread: Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- Next by thread: Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|