Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Doc O'Leary <droleary.usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:21:06 -0600
In article <kfydnYNdCO77zwnYnZ2dnUVZ_oqmnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Thomas Gagne <tgagne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm anxious to see how that approach implements a single $100 payment
with $98 to interest and $2 to principle. You'll also have to tell
nearly every two and four-year college to rewrite their /introductory/
accounting classes to get rid of credit and debit accounts.
I'm not so sure that's a bad thing. The point I was trying to make is
that instead of a system where a group of transactions taken as a whole
is balanced, it is perfectly reasonable to have a system where each
transaction is itself balanced. For your example, it'd go something
like:
check payment 100
payment interest 98
payment principle 2
This also supports encapsulation better because the details of how the
payment is broken up is really an internal matter, and the parts of the
system that track incoming checks really shouldn't be exposed to the
details of a split just to satisfy an old accounting practice.
--
My personal UDP list: 127.0.0.1, 4ax.com, buzzardnews.com, googlegroups.com,
heapnode.com, localhost, x-privat.org
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Thomas Gagne
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Thomas Gagne
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- References:
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Thomas Gagne
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: topmind
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Thomas Gagne
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Doc O'Leary
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Thomas Gagne
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: topmind
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Thomas Gagne
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: topmind
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Thomas Gagne
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: topmind
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- From: Thomas Gagne
- Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- Prev by Date: Re: Databases as objects
- Next by Date: Re: Modeling User/Accounts
- Previous by thread: Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- Next by thread: Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|