Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?

In article <cK-dnaMW4cN4sQjYnZ2dnUVZ_s6onZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Thomas Gagne <tgagne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I don't see where you disagreed since that's exactly what I said
before. The check transaction credits cash then debits interest and
principle (I think I got that right).

What, did you think double entry was the only way to get a system that
balances? If you really don't see the difference it just shows you
still need to think harder. As I said, the method of encapsulation
differs. To maintain a record of balance, your way requires you move
the transactions around the entire system. By using other objects we
can set up boundaries that allow separation of concerns.

--
My personal UDP list: 127.0.0.1, 4ax.com, buzzardnews.com, googlegroups.com,
heapnode.com, localhost, x-privat.org
.