Re: Booch's book feels too philosophical rather than practical?
- From: "Daniel T." <daniel_t@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:09:10 GMT
"topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But you forgot to mention another change pattern: loss of mutual
exclusiveness. If 2+ options change to no longer be mutually exclusive,
then procedural fairs better. It is a smaller change: just change the
CASE to IF statements. With polymorphism you have to move code to
different named modules, and I give that a much higher change cost
score.
An example please.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Booch's book feels too philosophical rather than practical?
- From: arnuld
- Re: Booch's book feels too philosophical rather than practical?
- From: Daniel T.
- Re: Booch's book feels too philosophical rather than practical?
- From: topmind
- Re: Booch's book feels too philosophical rather than practical?
- From: Robert Martin
- Re: Booch's book feels too philosophical rather than practical?
- From: topmind
- Booch's book feels too philosophical rather than practical?
- Prev by Date: Re: Critique of Robert C. Martin's "Agile Principles, Patterns, and Practices"
- Next by Date: Re: Booch's book feels too philosophical rather than practical?
- Previous by thread: Re: Booch's book feels too philosophical rather than practical?
- Next by thread: Re: Booch's book feels too philosophical rather than practical?
- Index(es):