Re: Biz Tree Challenge

topmind wrote:

S Perryman wrote:

I challenge you to produce a half-dozen biz taxonomies where ME or
trees are a safe bet. Just list the taxonomies in outline format:

TM>Node 1
TM>- foo
TM>- - bar under foo
TM>- floo
TM>Node 2
TM>- etc...

And I challenge you to produce a half-dozen "biz taxonomies" from
domains in which you have *actually been involved in developing systems
for* .

No hypotheticals. No "I cannot disclose information" etc.

I expect to see something *real* from you. From your "domain" (whatever
that actually is - because AFAIK you have *never* disclosed any specific
info on what you actually work on) .

Dude, the burden is NOT on me to show that biz trees or ME-lists don't
exist. If you claim unicorns exist, then it is your job to produce
unicorns, not mine. I cannot prove that unicorns don't exist even if
they don't and it is unrealistic to expect such. Unicorns are not
assumed to exist by default. Their existence is considered
"unconfirmed" until the movies or corpses come in. Similarly, biz
trees/MEs are assumed "unconfirmed" until somebody produces them.

ROTLMAO. Back to the unicorns again.
A pathetic argument that I recall was succinctly dealt with last December
by Dmitry Kazakov.

As always, you are completely blown out of the water by the simplest
of requests. But to completely nail you (in your own words) :

I challenge you to produce a half-dozen biz taxonomies where *SETS* are a
safe bet. Just list the taxonomies in outline format:

Node 1
- foo
- - bar under foo
- floo
Node 2
- etc...

(You can multipley the dash numbers by 2 if it helps improve the
visual.)


And for me specifically, I would like to see as many of those
taxonomies as possible coming from domains for which you have
*actually worked on systems development for* .


> Got Trees?

Sorry, I use OO. OO is about *graphs* , not trees.
Another simple thing to blow you out of the water (where will it
end) ...


Regards,
Steven Perryman
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Biz Tree Challenge
    ... Just list the taxonomies in outline format: ... TM>- - bar under foo ... If you claim unicorns exist, then it is your job to produce ... Most taxonomies are best represented as trees (or mutually-exclusive ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
    ... > Mind you in all other parts of this project I just used plain old OOP, ... Forced trees are not the solution. ... Hardwiring taxonomies into code is not "separation". ... >>> Now we need a new subtype which requires similar but different ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Biz Tree Challenge
    ... Most taxonomies are best represented as trees (or mutually-exclusive ... Most taxonomies are best represented as sets. ... The issue is one of extensibility: being able to extend an existing class ... The morphology of class instances may vary a bit. ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Biz Tree Challenge
    ... Most taxonomies are best represented as trees (or mutually-exclusive ... Most taxonomies are best represented as sets. ... Whether one likes OOP or not, it is useful, from a formal methods ... better than your dog," are equally foolish. ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: whats abstraction?
    ... > multiple levels of abstraction. ... due to life-forms which "hijack" DNA snippets, ... trees are a "useful lie" in biology. ... And neither am I maintaining that type taxonomies ...
    (comp.object)