Re: Topic-Organized Object-Oriented Programming

On Feb 8, 6:09 am, "Booted Cat" <yaoziy...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

DAG is always an intuitive generalization of tree.

You have to ignore Topmind on this topic.

He lives in some deluded fantasy world where the OO type regime is
based on trees, when it is as you have stated based on graphs. He
then tries to base much of his anti-OO rants on this delusion.

We dare not throw in currently available type substitution regimes
because that would shatter his 'set-based is better and OO cannot
do that' rants too (could book him a place in the looney-bin) ... :-)


Regards,
Steven Perryman

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Topic-Organized Object-Oriented Programming
    ... He lives in some deluded fantasy world where the OO type regime is ... based on trees, when it is as you have stated based on graphs. ... We dare not throw in currently available type substitution regimes ... language if one bothers to write libraries or language extensions. ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Topic-Organized Object-Oriented Programming
    ... He lives in some deluded fantasy world where the OO type regime is ... based on trees, when it is as you have stated based on graphs. ... We dare not throw in currently available type substitution regimes ... language if one bothers to write libraries or language extensions. ...
    (comp.object)