struggling with Design -Paradigms
- From: "arnuld" <geek.arnuld@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Feb 2007 07:16:08 -0800
hai all,
1st of all, thanks for the replies, to my earlier post, and now with
your help (the comp.object folks :-) the confusion has gone, i am
very clear on my goals but still i have some difficulties. i will be
brief:
i do understand the meaning of variables,objects,function as i have
done some Lisp, so i can say i am not a complete newbie. yes, i have
written some trivial programes too and i can understand books written
for programmers (like Programming Ruby) but cannot understand books
written for for much experienced programmers (like Stroustrup's TC++PL
3/e). since i have never done any professional coding at some company
so i consider myself a beginner.i want to go directly to OOD (without
learning any anything else like procedural paradigm or algorithms).
Is this right way?
i will be looking for a job using C++ but searching the archives of
this newsgroup tells me that is not a good idea. hence, is it OK to
go to through path:
OOA-D -> OOP using Eiffel/Ruby -> C++
?
thanks
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: struggling with Design -Paradigms
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: struggling with Design -Paradigms
- From: topmind
- Re: struggling with Design -Paradigms
- From: Daniel T.
- Re: struggling with Design -Paradigms
- Prev by Date: Re: Critique of Robert C. Martin's "Agile Principles, Patterns, and Practices"
- Next by Date: Re: The reality of Topmind (Was: Topic-Organized Object-Oriented Programming)
- Previous by thread: looking for design patterns of interacting state machine
- Next by thread: Re: struggling with Design -Paradigms
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|