Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax

frebe wrote:
<snip>
The techniques used to decouple
components and avoid big balls of mud offer significant benefits,
particularly in addressing non-functional requirements.

Can you prove this claim?

The benefits of decoupling SQL has to be considered unknown until
someone can prove them. But the disadvantages (more bloated code) are
easy to prove and has to be accepted as facts.
What would you consider proof? If LOC remained constant but modularity increased, would that be proof? If LOC was constant and testability increased, would that be proof? If LOC remained constant but portability increased, would that remain constant?

--
Visit <http://blogs.instreamfinancial.com/anything.php> to read my rants on technology and the finance industry.
.