Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax

In article <1172312439.076736.245690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
frebe73@xxxxxxxxx says...

[ ... ]

SQL is the best availible language for data management. Other
languages are better for other tasks.

Once again: prove it. Post an objective proof that SQL is better than
FDL. Post an objective proof that SQL is better than PFL. Post an
objective proof that SQL is better than QUEL. Post an objective proof
that SQL is better than XQuery.

Of course, that's only a tiny smattering of languages you'd need to
compare before you got well started -- the fact of the matter is that
you're just displaying viciferous ignorance.

[ ... ]

So far, nobody at comp.object have proved this.

See above -- you have a LOT of proofs to post before you have any room
to complain about anybody else. To support even a single sentence, you
need an open-ended set of proofs, none of which you seem to have been
attempted -- or even have a clue of how to start.

--
Later,
Jerry.

The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
    ... Post an objective proof that SQL is better than PFL. ... Google and wikipedia does not give any relevant hits for FDL or PFL. ... with the hierarchical model, please consult Wikipedia or some other ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
    ... languages are better for other tasks. ... Post an objective proof that SQL is better than PFL. ... Google and wikipedia does not give any relevant hits for FDL or PFL. ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
    ... languages are better for other tasks. ... Post an objective proof that SQL is better than PFL. ... Google and wikipedia does not give any relevant hits for FDL or PFL. ...
    (comp.object)