Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: "topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Feb 2007 22:33:43 -0800
Patrick May wrote:
"topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Schemas *usually* change for the same reasons as application code
changes.
In simple CRUD and reporting systems, possibly. In enterprise
systems where the database supports multiple applications and smaller
components, no.
Schemas should mostly only change if the *business rules* or structure
of the biz changes. If a new rule trickles to other apps, then it
trickles to other apps because a change in biz is a change in biz.
Again, we would like to see specific common change scenarios. We are
not going to take your word for it, because you are a sneaky dog.
Sincerely,
Patrick
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-T-
.
- References:
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: topmind
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: topmind
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: topmind
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: frebe
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: frebe
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: frebe
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: frebe
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: frebe
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: topmind
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: topmind
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- Prev by Date: Re: struggling with Design -Paradigms
- Next by Date: Re: Scenario Frequency Battle (was: Relational-to-OOP Tax)
- Previous by thread: Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- Next by thread: Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
- Index(es):