comp.object

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Long Life Objects
  • From: timeisfire8
• Re: Metaphor-oriented programming
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Subtle improvement to sequence diagrams....Re: Web based sequence diagram generator
  • From: steve . hanov
• Re: Use Cases
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Metaphor-oriented programming
  • From: digehode
• Re: Use Cases
  • From: bui
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: adaworks
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: topmind
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: throatslasher
• Re: Use Cases
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Long Life Objects
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: topmind
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: throatslasher
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: topmind
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: throatslasher
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: topmind
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: throatslasher
• Re: Web based sequence diagram generator
  • From: bui
• Use Cases
  • From: bui
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Is OOP harder to get right? (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Double Dispatch Problem: Mobile Creatures and Projectiles in a Game World
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Leslie Sanford
• Re: Double Dispatch Problem: Mobile Creatures and Projectiles in a Game World
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Double Dispatch Problem: Mobile Creatures and Projectiles in a Game World
  • From: Ed Kirwan
• Re: Long Life Objects
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Long Life Objects
  • From: timeisfire8
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: adaworks
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: adaworks
• Re: Difference between Factory and Abstract Factory
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Double Dispatch Problem: Mobile Creatures and Projectiles in a Game World
  • From: Aaron J. M.
• Re: Applications of sequence diagrams
  • From: EventHelix.com
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: topmind
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: throatslasher
• Re: Double Dispatch Problem: Mobile Creatures and Projectiles in a Game World
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Double Dispatch Problem: Mobile Creatures and Projectiles in a Game World
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: topmind
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Double Dispatch Problem: Mobile Creatures and Projectiles in a Game World
  • From: Aaron J. M.
• Re: Long Life Objects
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Oracle buys Tangosol -- Beginning of the end for RDBMS
  • From: alexandre_paterson
• Re: Double Dispatch Problem: Mobile Creatures and Projectiles in a Game World
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Double Dispatch Problem: Mobile Creatures and Projectiles in a Game World
  • From: Aaron J. M.
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: Double Dispatch Problem: Mobile Creatures and Projectiles in a Game World
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: Thomas Kowalski
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: Thomas Kowalski
• Re: Double Dispatch Problem: Mobile Creatures and Projectiles in a Game World
  • From: Ed Wegner
• Re: Long Life Objects
  • From: timeisfire8
• Double Dispatch Problem: Mobile Creatures and Projectiles in a Game World
  • From: Aaron J. M.
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Design pattern to sync objects
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Long Life Objects
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: topmind
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: throatslasher
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Long Life Objects
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Design pattern to sync objects
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: Separation of concerns
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: topmind
• Separation of concerns
  • From: Thomas Kowalski
• Re: Long Life Objects
  • From: timeisfire8
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Design pattern to sync objects
  • From: Bryan
• Re: Design pattern to sync objects
  • From: Kai Schwebke
• Re: Design pattern to sync objects
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Design pattern to sync objects
  • From: Bryan
• Re: Long Life Objects
  • From: topmind
• Re: Long Life Objects
  • From: timeisfire8
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Long Life Objects
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: ggroups
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Difference between Factory and Abstract Factory
  • From: RichardETVS
• Re: Applications of sequence diagrams
  • From: nupul
• Subtle improvement to sequence diagrams....Re: Web based sequence diagram generator
  • From: John Carter
• Re: Oracle buys Tangosol -- Beginning of the end for RDBMS
  • From: topmind
• Re: Difference between Factory and Abstract Factory
  • From: AndyW
• Web based sequence diagram generator
  • From: steve . hanov
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: topmind
• Oracle buys Tangosol -- Beginning of the end for RDBMS
  • From: seanwinship
• for shelli: truly intelligent active newsgroups - hudsa at - (1/1)
  • From: frederigo
• Applications of sequence diagrams
  • From: Krivenok Dmitry
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Long Life Objects
  • From: timeisfire8
• Re: Difference between Factory and Abstract Factory
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: topmind
• Long Life Objects
  • From: timeisfire8
• Re: Detect changes in business object (save file or not)
  • From: jaguaracisilva
• Re: looking for design patterns of interacting state machine
  • From: jaguaracisilva
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: adaworks
• Re: Difference between Factory and Abstract Factory
  • From: Ed
• OO and Extending (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: adaworks
• Difference between Factory and Abstract Factory
  • From: EvilOldGit
• Re: Detect changes in business object (save file or not)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Detect changes in business object (save file or not)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Detect changes in business object (save file or not)
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Detect changes in business object (save file or not)
  • From: Robert Schneider
• State of the Art Software Development Practices
  • From: dant262
• C++ Programmer
  • From: Mike
• Re: Are you developing for the Web?
  • From: Diego
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: frebe
• Re: How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: throatslasher
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Are you developing for the Web?
  • From: editormt
• Re: How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: throatslasher
• Re: How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: throatslasher
• Re: Java library of patterns
  • From: krasicki
• Computer Job Vacancy
  • From: sumberbisnis
• Re: Java library of patterns
  • From: Gabriel Claramunt
• Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view
  • From: JXStern
• Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view
  • From: topmind
• Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view
  • From: topmind
• Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view
  • From: JXStern
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Separated Interface pattern
  • From: RichardETVS
• Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Java library of patterns
  • From: Peri
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: Diego
• Re: data structure complexity vs. application maintenance cost
  • From: frebe
• Java library of patterns
  • From: joshua . krinsky
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: An object-oriented network DBMS from relational DBMS point of view
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: data structure complexity vs. application maintenance cost
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Separated Interface pattern
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Separated Interface pattern
  • From: PS
• Re: data structure complexity vs. application maintenance cost
  • From: frebe
• Re: How to model function(not class member function) in sequence diagram??
  • From: Johan Stuyts
• Separated Interface pattern
  • From: RichardETVS
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• How to model function(not class member function) in sequence diagram??
  • From: Mosly
• Re: data structure complexity vs. application maintenance cost
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: Kreeg
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: Gabriel Gonzalez
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: frebe
• Re: How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: John Carter
• Re: Confused a bit...
  • From: topmind
• Re: Critique of Robert C. Martin's "Agile Principles, Patterns, and Practices"
  • From: topmind
• Re: Critique of Robert C. Martin's "Agile Principles, Patterns, and Practices"
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Critique of Robert C. Martin's "Agile Principles, Patterns, and Practices"
  • From: topmind
• Re: Critique of Robert C. Martin's "Agile Principles, Patterns, and Practices"
  • From: Mike
• Re: How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: Diego
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: Kreeg
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: topmind
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: Kreeg
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: Kreeg
• UML: Interface - Manifest or Realization
  • From: Lilly
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: frebe
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: topmind
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: Kreeg
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: frebe
• Re: How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: Phlip
• How Not to Design a Dog.
  • From: John Carter
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Biz Tree Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: Kreeg
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: Kreeg
• Re: Biz Tree Challenge
  • From: adaworks
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: frebe
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: frebe
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: frebe
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: topmind
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: Kreeg
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: topmind
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: Kreeg
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: topmind
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: topmind
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: In search of Knowledge
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Practices for avoiding tight coupling?
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Design clarification
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Practices for avoiding tight coupling?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Practices for avoiding tight coupling?
  • From: jzfredricks
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Practices for avoiding tight coupling?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Biz Tree Challenge
  • From: topmind
• Re: Practices for avoiding tight coupling?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Design clarification
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Expose Interface Contracts for Component Periodics?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Biz Tree Challenge
  • From: adaworks
• Re: Practices for avoiding tight coupling?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Booch's book feels too philosophical rather than practical?
  • From: adaworks
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Practices for avoiding tight coupling?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Booch's book feels too philosophical rather than practical?
  • From: topmind
• Re: can i learn OOD without any procedural 1st
  • From: Matthieu Villeneuve
• Practices for avoiding tight coupling?
  • From: jzfredricks
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Design clarification
  • From: sri
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: arnuld
• Design clarification
  • From: sri
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Booch's book feels too philosophical rather than practical?
  • From: adaworks
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: pandit
• Re: Expose Interface Contracts for Component Periodics?
  • From: kk_oop
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: Kreeg
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: topmind
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: Kreeg
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: topmind
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: Kreeg
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: topmind
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: Kreeg
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: topmind
• Re: looking for design patterns of interacting state machine
  • From: Steven P
• Re: learning OOD with C++, good idea ?
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: topmind
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: Kreeg
• Re: Expose Interface Contracts for Component Periodics?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• learning OOD with C++, good idea ?
  • From: pandit
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: arnuld
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: topmind
• Re: learning OOD with C++, good idea ?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: In search of Knowledge
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• learning OOD with C++, good idea ?
  • From: pandit
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Expose Interface Contracts for Component Periodics?
  • From: kk_oop
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: karl . wettin
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: frebe
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: topmind
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: topmind
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: In search of Knowledge
  • From: Guy Horton
• Re: In search of Knowledge
  • From: Guy Horton
• Re: Relational-to-OOP Tax
  • From: mAsterdam

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(10)