Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?

On Mar 1, 9:48 pm, "Mark Nicholls" <Nicholls.M...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 23 Feb, 13:22, "arnuld" <geek.arn...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 22, 10:53 pm, "Mark Nicholls" <Nicholls.M...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
it is trivial to consider procedural programming as a special case of
OO, OO gives you some extra bells and whistles that make life easier
(or more complex depending on what hat you've got on).

you mean one can learn OOD without learning procedural paradigm

?


technically yes....

it would be equivalent to learning to run without first learning to
walk though, once you'd learnt to run someone could tell you that
walking was just running slowly.

i did not get whether that was a +ve comment or -ve one. i mean, i did
not get whether you recommend precedural 1st or not. really sorry but
your reply is ambiguous to me :-(

thanks

-- arnuld
http://arnuld.blogspot.com

.

Relevant Pages