Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 20:55:03 +0100
On 1 Mar 2007 08:48:25 -0800, Mark Nicholls wrote:
On 23 Feb, 13:22, "arnuld" <geek.arn...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 22, 10:53 pm, "Mark Nicholls" <Nicholls.M...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
it is trivial to consider procedural programming as a special case of
OO, OO gives you some extra bells and whistles that make life easier
(or more complex depending on what hat you've got on).
you mean one can learn OOD without learning procedural paradigm
?
-- arnuldhttp://arnuld.blogspot.com
technically yes....
it would be equivalent to learning to run without first learning to
walk though, once you'd learnt to run someone could tell you that
walking was just running slowly.
During running at some time points the feet are off the ground.
Sorry, I just could not resist... (:-))
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- From: pandit
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- References:
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- From: Mark Nicholls
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- Prev by Date: Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
- Next by Date: Re: It's the Psychology, Stupid (Was: The reality of Topmind)
- Previous by thread: Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|