Re: Long Life Objects



Well, you have been taught bullsh8t from excessive OOP zealots. And
RDB's are not just about "persistence". They standardize and package
common attribute-management and collection-oriented idioms, AKA
"reuse".

Thank you for your post topmind. I enjoyed reading your website and
these two extracts in particular are what triggered my original post:

-----Quoted from oop.ismad.com
"Also note that in many cases classifications are given by the users
via an interface, and not done by programmers via programming code.
Accountants build and maintain actual accounting code categories for
example, and not the programmers, except in special cases."

"Users often maintain real-world hierarchies, such as product
categories and accounting codes, via hierarchy edit interfaces, and
not programmers writing subclasses. In other words, the hierarchy
nodes are stored in a database, and not in program code."
-----End quotes

My AddressType and Service categories are indeed given by the users
via an interface and I am struggling to find the 'correct' OO way to
handle them.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Long Life Objects
    ... RDB's are not just about "persistence". ... common attribute-management and collection-oriented idioms, ... and not done by programmers via programming code. ... Accountants build and maintain actual accounting code categories for ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: The coming death of all RISC chips.
    ... perhaps a more accurate statement is "when reasoning ... programmers have become used to thinking procedurally and ... A hierarchy is the most constrained form of parallelism, ... but I have seen proofs with other parallel structures, ...
    (comp.arch)
  • Re: what is wrong with class variables? (newby)
    ... The trouble was that programmers used them to store 'State' that ... when there is a quasi-static condition to be transmitted to a hierarchy ... Rails does even something more interesting: ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)
  • Re: working storage values
    ... If the sequence numbers aren't ... reflective of any structural hierarchy then what is the point of them ... make it more maintainable for the new generation of programmers at the same ... I'm proud to have been a COBOL Programmer and I don't want the new ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: newbie architecture question
    ... Joe Poniatowski wrote: ... >I wish to define a hierarchy of classes - something like book, chapter, ... Class definitions should *NOT* be nested. ... If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote ...
    (comp.lang.python)