Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- From: <adaworks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 04:24:50 -0800
"S Perryman" <q@xxxxx> wrote in message news:euo015$kpk$1@xxxxxxxxxxx
Steve,
The question is (now that you have been confronted with the painful truth)
whether you will now :
The best course of action with regard to the Topmind is to simply
ignore him. That is what every member of this forum should
resolve to do. Let him rant. But let his rants go with no response
at all.
He simply takes up time better spent on productive dialogue. Nothing
he says can make any difference. Nothing he says makes any
contribution. And nothing he says has any meaning in the professional
lives of members of the forum.
Conversation with him has no value other than the entertainment. He
will never be persuaded of anything. He does not pay attention to anyone
but himself except to taunt, ridicule, and declaim. His arguments are
specious, disingenuous, and not worth taking seriously.
So, I recommend we all ignore his self-proclaimed hobby. Perhaps he
will find another that actually makes a contribution instead on one that
has no value other than to annoy a lot of people with its obvious
ignorance.
Richard Riehle
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- From: topmind
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- From: S Perryman
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- References:
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- From: S Perryman
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- From: topmind
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- From: S Perryman
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- Prev by Date: Re: Software Engineering is Rot (Was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
- Next by Date: Re: Long Life Objects
- Previous by thread: Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|