Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- From: "topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Apr 2007 15:04:46 -0700
adaworks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
"S Perryman" <q@xxxxx> wrote in message news:euoo5c$886$1@xxxxxxxxxxx
adaworks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:Yes. He has been spewing the same nonsense non-stop for a long
The best course of action with regard to the Topmind is to simply
ignore him. That is what every member of this forum should
resolve to do.
I sensed a moment of deja-vu, and so consulted the Oracle :
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=%22we+got+there+in+the+end%22+comp.object&start=0&scoring=d&filter=0&
time. This is clearly a case of someone with "too much time on
his hands."
OO'ers are the nonsense spiggots, NOT me.
"OO is the biggest scam since A.I." - A. Stepanov.
Even so, the very fact that we even discuss him at all is exactly what
he wants. This kind of person can delight in being reviled or being
adored, but will go berserk on being completely ignored.
So. Those who are regular members of this forum would do well to
Note well not only the thread from the first link shown in the list, but
also the *date* .
simply ignore his postings - or, at least not respond to them. When
a newbie does join in the discussion, pose a question, or otherwise
become potential prey for his silliness, they should be warned about
his penchant for obfuscation,
Me obfuscation????? Where's the proof OO is objectively better??????
You guys are the ones who debate with vague notions and "just trust
me" plees.
Hypocrits!
and having been given that warning, be
allowed to decide for themselves whether they wish to engage in an
endless exchange of total nonsense.
I recommend the policy of the forum's veteran's be to ignore him at
every opportunity. Otherwise, he will continue to waste bandwidth
with his inane diatribes.
Richard Riehle
Get some proof that OO is better instead of bash the hell out of me.
Then just link to that when I say otherwise. USE EVIDENCE TO STOP ME,
not personal attacks.
Expecting people to just trust your anocdotes is dumb.
Defend OO instead of bash me.
Defend OO instead of bash me.
Defend OO instead of bash me.
Defend OO instead of bash me.
Defend OO instead of bash me.
-T-
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- From: Daniel Parker
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- References:
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- From: S Perryman
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- From: topmind
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- From: S Perryman
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- From: adaworks
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- From: S Perryman
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- From: adaworks
- Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- Next by Date: Boost OO instead of bash people (was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
- Previous by thread: Boost OO instead of bash people (was: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?)
- Next by thread: Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|