Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?

On Apr 1, 8:16 pm, "topmind" <topm...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Daniel Parker wrote:
But the fact that you just drop the quote, and make no effort to
convey why Stepanov doesn't like OO, proves Steven's point. You can't
seem to get beyond the assertion "OO bad", you can't dig deeper, and
nobody gets any points for an assertion.

One can read Stepanov's stuff for themselves.

The point is, you're focusing on the quote. Anyone who took this
seriously would be focusing on the reasons. For example, Stepanov
claims that the statement "everything is an object" is not very
interesting. Well, RCM would agree with that, as would a lot of other
people on this group. If you took your hobby seriously, you would be
focusing on the reasons. You don't take your hobby seriously. You're
lazy. If you must practice your hobby, take it seriously, the way the
train people do.

ADT's are poor at modeling biz at non-trivial scales. They are at least not better than sets. Sets are superior to
ADT's in my opinion. ADT's are a nice concept, they just don't plug in well to my domain.

ADT's don't "model" anything, they permit abstraction of operations.
Many third party libraries depend on that.

I assume everyone in comp.object cares about ADTs. You don't care
about ADTs, but we don't care about you.

Regards,
Daniel Parker

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
    ... convey why Stepanov doesn't like OO, ... nobody gets any points for an assertion. ... I assume everyone in comp.object cares about ADTs. ... but we don't care about you. ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Is Procedural Paradigm a basis of OO Paradigm?
    ... convey why Stepanov doesn't like OO, ... nobody gets any points for an assertion. ... I assume everyone in comp.object cares about ADTs. ... but we don't care about you. ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Wheres the prayers?
    ... despite the assertion of some t.o. ... You have no idea what was going on in their minds, ... Sounds more like he was busy and was glad someone took care of it for him. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Railways
    ... Market forces. ... No, because I was right the first time, your assertion isn't ... So we have my opinion, followed by your question 'Why', followed by my ... perhaps you would care to explain why I shouldn't ...
    (uk.transport)
  • Re: Railways
    ... Market forces. ... I haven't made an assertion, apart from the fact that your statement is untrue. ... I also have spent many years in transport and I resent your implication that I am too idle, only SWMBO has the rights to say that. ... perhaps you would care to explain why I shouldn't have an apology? ...
    (uk.transport)