Re: OO-Inquisition
- From: AndyW <a@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:08:47 +1200
On 17 Apr 2007 08:17:57 -0700, coeval <hvfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am flaggerbasted how Topmind is treated in comp.object newsgroup.
Just for saying OO is not the dreamed "silver bullet" that would fix
all issues in software coding.
I cant speak for the others but I enjoy his posts (and others) post
that challenge the common perceptions. Its good to have someone
question the theories as it makes the others revisit their world view.
I may not agree with many of his theories, but then people probably
dont agree with mine.
What I dont agree with is people that make it personal or resort to
using emotive language which in my view is wrong in any forum.
----------------
AndyW,
Mercenary Software Developer
.
- References:
- OO-Inquisition
- From: coeval
- OO-Inquisition
- Prev by Date: Re: OO Principle - reference needed
- Next by Date: Re: OO Principle - reference needed
- Previous by thread: Mixing Paradigms (Re: OO-Inquisition)
- Next by thread: Re: OO-Inquisition
- Index(es):