Re: OO-Inquisition
- From: Thomas Gagne <tgagne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:49:30 -0400
Alvin Ryder wrote:
<snip>20 years ago, the same was true of C and FORTRAN. I worked with a staff
I've witnessed the work of hundreds of OO developers, the state of
affairs isn't exactly pretty.
of 50 programmers, fewer than 10 of which were excellent, which for most
staffs is above average.
That said, given any sampling of programmers, only have of them will be
better than average. Programming isn't math or baking. Programmers
can't just follow recipes and come up with good programs, or understand
how to wield paradigms to the greatest affect. It matters little
whether its procedural, OO, or relational.
So it's unfair to measure a language's or paradigm's effectiveness by
measuring how 90% of programmers use it. To realize what really can be
done we should look at how the top 10% of programmers are able to bend
any language, paradigm, or idiom to their will and learn from that.
--
Visit <http://blogs.instreamfinancial.com/anything.php>
to read my rants on technology and the finance industry.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OO-Inquisition
- From: Alvin Ryder
- Re: OO-Inquisition
- References:
- OO-Inquisition
- From: coeval
- Re: OO-Inquisition
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: OO-Inquisition
- From: Alvin Ryder
- OO-Inquisition
- Prev by Date: Re: OO-Inquisition
- Next by Date: Re: OO-Inquisition
- Previous by thread: Re: OO-Inquisition
- Next by thread: Re: OO-Inquisition
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|