Re: OO-Inquisition


"topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1176993429.286370.286310@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

PS wrote:
"topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1176875025.212559.213490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

PS wrote:
"coeval" <hvfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1176823077.512104.46210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am flaggerbasted how Topmind is treated in comp.object newsgroup.

Go to a database newsgroup and tell them to use more OOP and see how
they
treat you.

Last month I was allegedly a lone nutball. Now its the whole DB
group?

No, when you are in the DB groups we don't consider you a nutball.

So, insanity is relative?

Yes. Smoking a joint in Amsterdam in front of a policeman would be
considered sane. Doing the same in New York City would be considered insane.


And if an OO'er goes over to the DB group and bashes relational?

I would consider them to be a nutball to do that.

(Which they have a right to do IMO)



You're flip-flopping, just like your OO evidence.


-T-



.