Re: Design Patterns and Functional programming

From: arnuld <geek.arnuld@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:33:32 -0000

Jon Harrop wrote:
Is there any literature describing how object-oriented design patterns
reinvent existing techniques like functional programming?

--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
The OCaml Journal
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_journal/?usenet

i think people need to read this before replying further:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/browse_thread/thread/e016151d4ff4df6b/#

.

References:
- Design Patterns and Functional programming
  - From: Jon Harrop

Prev by Date: Re: Design Patterns and Functional programming
Next by Date: TROLL alert (was: Design Patterns and Functional programming)
Previous by thread: Re: Design Patterns and Functional programming
Next by thread: Re: Design Patterns and Functional programming
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Design Patterns and Functional programming
... reinvent existing techniques like functional programming? ... Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy ...
(comp.object)
Re: How Lisps Nested Notation Limits The Languages Utility
... other newsgroups with some functional programming ... Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy ...
(comp.lang.lisp)
Re: JVM vs CLR
... Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. ... The one common element to your posts, ...
(comp.lang.lisp)
Re: F# more popular than Common Lisp
... Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy ... OCaml for Scientistshttp://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/?usenet ...
(comp.lang.lisp)
Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
... Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy ... Objective CAML for Scientists ...
(comp.lang.lisp)