comp.object

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull)
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull)
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull)
  • From: S Perryman
• Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull)
  • From: S Perryman
• Abstraction & singleton
  • From: Erdinç
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: S Perryman
• Testing Code (Re: too much OOP ?)
  • From: topmind
• Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines
  • From: Robert Martin
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines
  • From: Robert Martin
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Robert Martin
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Robert Martin
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Robert Martin
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Robert Martin
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Robert Martin
• Re: Real World Flunks (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successful)
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Real World Flunks (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successful)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: assert{ 2.0 } - a new kind of assertion
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: assert{ 2.0 } - a new kind of assertion
  • From: Martin Vuille
• [OT] Re: assert{ 2.0 } - a new kind of assertion
  • From: Robert Klemme
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Real World Flunks (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successful)
  • From: S Perryman
• Robert Martins' payroll example (Was: Why is Object Oriented so successfull)
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Real World Flunks (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successful)
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Real World Flunks (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successful)
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Real World Flunks (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successful)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Real World Flunks (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successful)
  • From: topmind
• CFP: DATICS 2008 - Design, Analysis and Tools for Integrated Circuits and Systems
  • From: DATICS2008
• Re: sale.submit() or submitter.submit(sale)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Use case and API
  • From: linq936
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Real World Flunks (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successful)
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Real World Flunks (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successful)
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Use cases email system
  • From: EventHelix.com
• Re: sale.submit() or submitter.submit(sale)
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Refactoring into ravioli code
  • From: topmind
• Re: Refactoring into ravioli code
  • From: Bizonho
• Re: sale.submit() or submitter.submit(sale)
  • From: Nanne
• sale.submit() or submitter.submit(sale)
  • From: greatlord_5
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: Real World Flunks (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successful)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Excellent Consultants Available for Different Position
  • From: chandu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Real World Flunks (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successful)
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Real World Flunks (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successful)
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: topmind
• Re: Place objects in threads and processes in UML
  • From: d99alu
• Re: Dynamic foreach algorithm
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Place objects in threads and processes in UML
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Dynamic foreach algorithm
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Place objects in threads and processes in UML
  • From: junk . email . al
• Place objects in threads and processes in UML
  • From: d99alu
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Error: A referral was returned from the server
  • From: Shadow of Socrates
• [C#] How to measure the time of your code's execution
  • From: Shadow of Socrates
• Use cases email system
  • From: learnfpga@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dynamic foreach algorithm
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Dynamic foreach algorithm
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: question about component integration or assembly
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Patrick May
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Patrick May
• Carnegie Mellon Software Architecture courses in NYC
  • From: mtbass
• Re: question about component integration or assembly
  • From: shashank
• Re: question about component integration or assembly
  • From: shashank
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: question about component integration or assembly
  • From: hanliong
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: jimbalo22
• Re: question about component integration or assembly
  • From: hanliong
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: jimbalo22
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: jimbalo22
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: frebe
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: jimbalo22
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: question about component integration or assembly
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: jimbalo22
• Re: Dynamic foreach algorithm
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Dynamic foreach algorithm
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: Tegiri Nenashi
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Dynamic foreach algorithm
  • From: WALLYWORLD
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: jimbalo22
• Re: question about component integration or assembly
  • From: WALLYWORLD
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: question about component integration or assembly
  • From: shashank
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Dynamic foreach algorithm
  • From: Veloz
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: question about component integration or assembly
  • From: Matteo Bordin
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: jimbalo22
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: Tegiri Nenashi
• Re: Please recommend conceptual reading
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: question about component integration or assembly
  • From: WALLYWORLD
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: rugby fan
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Please recommend conceptual reading
  • From: topmind
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: topmind
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: question about component integration or assembly
  • From: liongster
• Re: How should a container class "know" its contained objects?
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: Refactoring into ravioli code
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: How should a container class "know" its contained objects?
  • From: Veloz
• Re: How should a container class "know" its contained objects?
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: How should a container class "know" its contained objects?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: How should a container class "know" its contained objects?
  • From: Veloz
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: How should a container class "know" its contained objects?
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: which of these OO books for 1st reading ?
  • From: Ishan
• Re: question about component integration or assembly
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Refactoring into ravioli code
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: How should a container class "know" its contained objects?
  • From: Veloz
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: jimbalo22
• Re: How should a container class "know" its contained objects?
  • From: Daniel T.
• question about component integration or assembly
  • From: liongster
• Re: How should a container class "know" its contained objects?
  • From: Veloz
• china wholesale nike jordan sneakers WWW.21cn-shoes.COM discount gucci prada puma
  • From: YEUPP
• Re: Asserts for Embedded Systems
  • From: Miguel Oliveira e Silva
• Re: How should a container class "know" its contained objects?
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Refactoring into ravioli code
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Asserts for Embedded Systems
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Asserts for Embedded Systems
  • From: Miguel Oliveira e Silva
• Re: How should a container class "know" its contained objects?
  • From: Veloz
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: Refactoring into ravioli code
  • From: chris_a_brooks
• Re: Asserts for Embedded Systems
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Refactoring into ravioli code
  • From: Daniel T.
• Refactoring into ravioli code
  • From: chris_a_brooks
• Re: Asserts for Embedded Systems
  • From: Miguel Oliveira e Silva
• Re: Derived class calling overriden base class methods
  • From: Alexandr Savinov
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: frebe
• Re: How should a container class "know" its contained objects?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: jimbalo22
• Re: How should a container class "know" its contained objects?
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: AndyW
• Re: How should a container class "know" its contained objects?
  • From: Daniel T.
• How should a container class "know" its contained objects?
  • From: Veloz
• Re: Asserts for Embedded Systems
  • From: John Carter
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Derived class calling overriden base class methods
  • From: Diego
• Re: Q: the dreaded diamond...
  • From: Dirk van Deun
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Nick Keighley
• UML2 - wiring provided/required ports
  • From: Matteo Bordin
• Re: Asserts for Embedded Systems
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Patrick May
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Patrick May
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Patrick May
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Asserts for Embedded Systems
  • From: John Carter
• trouble with particular aspect of MVC
  • From: stefoid
• Re: Fundamental terms, question (Object Thinking)
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: jimbalo22
• Re: Fundamental terms, question (Object Thinking)
  • From: lars_oberg
• Re: Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: object level locking and class level locking
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Fundamental terms, question (Object Thinking)
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Fundamental terms, question (Object Thinking)
  • From: lars_oberg
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: topmind
• Re: object level locking and class level locking
  • From: Patrick May
• Re: Fundamental terms, question (Object Thinking)
  • From: Daniel T.
• Business objects, subset of collection
  • From: jimbalo22
• Fundamental terms, question (Object Thinking)
  • From: lars_oberg
• Re: object level locking and class level locking
  • From: Martin Vuille
• Re: object level locking and class level locking
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: object level locking and class level locking
  • From: Daniel T.
• object level locking and class level locking
  • From: Christopher Pisz
• Re: Q: the dreaded diamond...
  • From: Martin Vuille
• Re: Derived class calling overriden base class methods
  • From: Daniel T.
• Final call for papers
  • From: john
• Re: Derived class calling overriden base class methods
  • From: Leslie Sanford
• Re: Derived class calling overriden base class methods
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Derived class calling overriden base class methods
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Derived class calling overriden base class methods
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Derived class calling overriden base class methods
  • From: Leslie Sanford
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: which of these OO books for 1st reading ?
  • From: WALLYWORLD
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: There is some way to stop the "M15" spam?
  • From: Patrick May
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: Phlip
• Why is Object Oriented so successfull
  • From: alexcpn
• Re: There is some way to stop the "M15" spam?
  • From: topmind
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: topmind
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: Proxy pattern: remote chat proxy and interfaces
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Proxy pattern: remote chat proxy and interfaces
  • From: Karsten Wutzke
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Two Active Interface
  • From: Phlip
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: There is some way to stop the "M15" spam?
  • From: James Barrett
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Two Active Interface
  • From: kmlrao
• Re: Asserts for Embedded Systems
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Asserts for Embedded Systems
  • From: John Carter
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: topmind
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Software Engineering Training in Memphis, Tennessee
  • From: Ed Berard
• Re: Q: the dreaded diamond...
  • From: Dirk van Deun
• Re: Pattern for multiple States
  • From: Martin Vuille
• Re: Pattern for multiple States
  • From: topmind
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Pattern for multiple States
  • From: Patrick May
• Re: Pattern for multiple States
  • From: James Barrett
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: There is some way to stop the "M15" spam?
  • From: Patrick May
• Re: Pattern for multiple States
  • From: Patrick May
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: There is some way to stop the "M15" spam?
  • From: ManicQin
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: There is some way to stop the "M15" spam?
  • From: topmind
• Re: There is some way to stop the "M15" spam?
  • From: topmind
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Pattern for multiple States
  • From: James Barrett
• Re: Pattern for multiple States
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Pattern for multiple States
  • From: James Barrett
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Q: the dreaded diamond...
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Q: the dreaded diamond...
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Q: the dreaded diamond...
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Q: the dreaded diamond...
  • From: Martin Vuille
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Q: the dreaded diamond...
  • From: kj
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: There is some way to stop the "M15" spam?
  • From: jeubeda
• Re: which of these OO books for 1st reading ?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: which of these OO books for 1st reading ?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: There is some way to stop the "M15" spam?
  • From: Ed Kirwan
• There is some way to stop the "M15" spam?
  • From: jeubeda
• Re: which of these OO books for 1st reading ?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: which of these OO books for 1st reading ?
  • From: pandit
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: which languages that support the construct "interface Foo<X> : X {...}"
  • From: kleczek . michal
• Re: which of these OO books for 1st reading ?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• better opportunity for h1b visa holders that they have not ever
  • From: aditya
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: frebe
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: which of these OO books for 1st reading ?
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: which of these OO books for 1st reading ?
  • From: Pandit
• Re: which of these OO books for 1st reading ?
  • From: arnuld
• Re: which of these OO books for 1st reading ?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: which of these OO books for 1st reading ?
  • From: rugby fan
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: which of these OO books for 1st reading ?
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: which of these OO books for 1st reading ?
  • From: Pandit
• Re: Please recommend conceptual reading
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: which of these OO books for 1st reading ?
  • From: Pandit
• Re: which of these OO books for 1st reading ?
  • From: Pandit
• Re: Please recommend conceptual reading
  • From: topmind
• Re: which of these OO books for 1st reading ?
  • From: topmind
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: topmind
• Re: too much OOP ?
  • From: topmind

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(18)