comp.object

• Date Index

---

• Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?, carofe
  • Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?, andrew queisser
    • Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?, carofe
  • Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
    • Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?, Daniel Pitts
      • Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?, S Perryman
      • Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?, Nick Keighley
      • Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?, S Perryman
  • Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?, Phlip
  • Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?, shashank
    • Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?, carofe
      • Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?, carofe
  • Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?, Robert Martin
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?, Patrick May
    • Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?, S Perryman
  • Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
• To reduce your body weight & slim your body, Loss weight
• development of C++ compiler, Grizlyk
  • Re: development of C++ compiler, Phlip
    • Re: development of C++ compiler, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: development of C++ compiler, Phlip
      • Re: development of C++ compiler, Dmitry A. Kazakov
  • Re: development of C++ compiler, H. S. Lahman
• Re: LSP Was: Mixing OO and DB, Daniel T.
• Re: LSP, Daniel T.
  • Re: LSP, Dmitry A. Kazakov
    • Re: LSP, Daniel T.
      • Re: LSP, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: LSP, Daniel T.
      • Re: LSP, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: LSP, Daniel T.
      • Re: LSP, Dmitry A. Kazakov
  • Re: LSP, S Perryman
• Required 6 Oracle Programmers {GC/Citizens}, Shazia
• Architecture of an enterprise application, multiple projects + multiple customers, Tomer
  • Re: Architecture of an enterprise application, multiple projects + multiple customers, Phlip
  • Re: Architecture of an enterprise application, multiple projects + multiple customers, Robert Martin
    • Re: Architecture of an enterprise application, multiple projects + multiple customers, Tomer
      • Re: Architecture of an enterprise application, multiple projects + multiple customers, Robert Martin
• Properties Shared Amongst Objects, Leslie Sanford
  • Re: Properties Shared Amongst Objects, Daniel T.
  • Re: Properties Shared Amongst Objects, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: Properties Shared Amongst Objects, Leslie Sanford
      • Re: Properties Shared Amongst Objects, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Properties Shared Amongst Objects, Dmitry A. Kazakov
  • Re: Properties Shared Amongst Objects, Robert Martin
• all solution manual manual solution study guide, sms123
• Retrieving unnecessary data, ShaneLM
  • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Daniel Pitts
  • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Phlip
    • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, ShaneLM
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Phlip
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Robert Martin
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Phlip
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Robert Martin
  • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
    • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, ShaneLM
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Robert Martin
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Robert Martin
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Robert Martin
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
    • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Robert Martin
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Robert Martin
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
  • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Daniel T.
  • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, ShaneLM
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Patrick May
      • Is OOP a Fad? (Re: Retrieving unnecessary data), topmind
      • Re: Is OOP a Fad? (Re: Retrieving unnecessary data), Robert Martin
      • Re: Is OOP a Fad? (Re: Retrieving unnecessary data), andrew queisser
      • Re: Is OOP a Fad? (Re: Retrieving unnecessary data), Phlip
      • Re: Is OOP a Fad? (Re: Retrieving unnecessary data), andrew queisser
      • Re: Is OOP a Fad? (Re: Retrieving unnecessary data), topmind
      • Re: Is OOP a Fad? (Re: Retrieving unnecessary data), Robert Martin
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Robert Martin
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Robert Martin
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Robert Martin
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Robert Martin
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Robert Martin
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
  • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Robert Martin
    • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Robert Martin
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
    • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Jordan Marr
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Jordan Marr
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Jordan Marr
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Jordan Marr
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, Jordan Marr
      • Re: Retrieving unnecessary data, topmind
• Mistaken Identity, Ed Berard
  • Re: Mistaken Identity, Daniel Pitts
• SETP-08 Draft paper submission deadline is just few days from now, john
• Inheritance of implementation: what is the reason of?, Grizlyk
  • Re: Inheritance of implementation: what is the reason of?, Daniel T.
  • Re: Inheritance of implementation: what is the reason of?, andrew queisser
  • Re: Inheritance of implementation: what is the reason of?, Robert Martin
  • Re: Inheritance of implementation: what is the reason of?, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Inheritance of implementation: what is the reason of?, Grizlyk
    • Re: Inheritance of implementation: what is the reason of?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Inheritance of implementation: what is the reason of?, Grizlyk
      • Re: Inheritance of implementation: what is the reason of?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Inheritance of implementation: what is the reason of?, Robert Martin
      • Re: Inheritance of implementation: what is the reason of?, Daniel T.
      • Re: Inheritance of implementation: what is the reason of?, S Perryman
      • Re: Inheritance of implementation: what is the reason of?, Robert Martin
      • Re: Inheritance of implementation: what is the reason of?, Daniel T.
  • Re: Inheritance of implementation: what is the reason of?, Grizlyk
    • Re: Inheritance of implementation: what is the reason of?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
• OOSE is outdated ?, arnuld
  • Re: OOSE is outdated ?, Marco Dorantes
    • Re: OOSE is outdated ?, Phlip
      • Re: OOSE is outdated ?, Marco Dorantes
  • Re: OOSE is outdated ?, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: OOSE is outdated ?, arnuld
      • Re: OOSE is outdated ?, H. S. Lahman
      • OO Methodolgy Perspective (was Re: OOSE is outdated ?), arnuld
      • Re: OO Methodolgy Perspective (was Re: OOSE is outdated ?), H. S. Lahman
      • Re: OO Methodolgy Perspective (was: OOSE is outdated ?), arnuld
      • Re: OO Methodolgy Perspective, Phlip
      • Re: OO Methodolgy Perspective, arnuld
      • Re: OO Methodolgy Perspective, Phlip
      • Re: OO Methodolgy Perspective, Robert Martin
      • Re: OO Methodolgy Perspective (was: OOSE is outdated ?), Robert Martin
      • Re: OO Methodolgy Perspective, H. S. Lahman
      • Translation (was: Re: OO Methodolgy Perspective), Patrick May
      • Re: Translation, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Translation, arnuld
      • OO Methodology Perpesctive, arnuld
      • Re: Translation, Robert Martin
      • Re: Translation, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Translation, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Translation, Patrick May
      • Re: Translation, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: OO Methodolgy Perspective, arnuld
      • Re: OO Methodolgy Perspective, Robert Martin
      • Re: OO Methodolgy Perspective, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: OO Methodolgy Perspective, Robert Martin
      • Re: OO Methodolgy Perspective, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: OO Methodolgy Perspective (was Re: OOSE is outdated ?), Robert Martin
      • Re: OO Methodolgy Perspective (was Re: OOSE is outdated ?), H. S. Lahman
      • Re: OO Methodolgy Perspective (was Re: OOSE is outdated ?), Robert Martin
      • Re: OOSE is outdated ?, topmind
  • Re: OOSE is outdated ?, Robert Martin
    • Re: OOSE is outdated ?, Patrick May
    • Re: OOSE is outdated ?, arnuld
• Re: Mixing OO and DB, Leslie Sanford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mixing OO and DB, Thomas Gagne
• Re: The UML looks a bit flat, Phlip
• CFP: Computer Graphics and Visualization 2008, natty2006@xxxxxxxxx
• TYPES 2008, Lorenzo Bettini
• Learn System Analysis and Design. Free Tutorial, ali
• FAST '08 Early Bird Registration Deadline Approaching, Lionel Garth Jones
• Order of Data members of a class, sreeni
• Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
  • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
    • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, andrew queisser
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, andrew queisser
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, andrew queisser
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, andrew queisser
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, topmind
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, mAsterdam
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, Robert Martin
      • Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull, adaworks
• Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, Robert Martin
  • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, topmind
    • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, S Perryman
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, Daniel Pitts
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, S Perryman
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, topmind
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, S Perryman
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, topmind
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, S Perryman
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, topmind
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, S Perryman
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, topmind
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, S Perryman
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, topmind
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, S Perryman
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, topmind
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, S Perryman
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, topmind
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, S Perryman
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, topmind
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, S Perryman
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, topmind
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, S Perryman
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, topmind
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, S Perryman
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, topmind
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, S Perryman
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, topmind
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, S Perryman
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, topmind
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, Robert Martin
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, topmind
  • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, Phlip
    • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, S Perryman
      • Re: object-oriented programming explained in 51 lines, Robert Martin
• Re: Refactoring into ravioli code, kevin cline
  • Re: Refactoring into ravioli code, Phlip
    • Re: Refactoring into ravioli code, Daniel T.
      • Re: Refactoring into ravioli code, topmind
      • Re: Refactoring into ravioli code, Phlip
      • Re: Refactoring into ravioli code, Daniel Pitts
      • Re: Refactoring into ravioli code, topmind
  • Re: Refactoring into ravioli code, topmind
• Re: Robert Martins' payroll example (Was: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
  • Re: Robert Martins' payroll example (Was: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), S Perryman
    • Re: Robert Martins' payroll example (Was: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
• event handling issues in presentation model, Wolfgang Rostek
• Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
  • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), S Perryman
    • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), S Perryman
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), S Perryman
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), S Perryman
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), S Perryman
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), S Perryman
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), S Perryman
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), S Perryman
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), S Perryman
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), S Perryman
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), S Perryman
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), S Perryman
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), S Perryman
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), andrew queisser
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), S Perryman
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), S Perryman
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), andrew queisser
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), topmind
      • Re: Variant record issues (Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull), S Perryman
• Re: Abstraction & singleton, Daniel T.

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(10)