Re: Retrieving unnecessary data
- From: topmind <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:06:36 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 14, 1:35 pm, ShaneLM <shane.nieberg...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Topmind - I like to think in DB terms a lot, perhaps that is my
problem. I'm trying to include all the foreign objects into the base
object similar to how keys of a database would link them.
All introductory material to OO that i've read describe a situation
where you are trying to model real world items (domain nouns /
business things) in classes. Are you saying that this is a bad
approach?? I'm intrigued.
Yes it is bad. It forces you to spend time and effort translating back
and forth between two fairly-high-level abstractions.
See: http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?OopBizDomainGap
OO is just a fad that stays alive by inventing new sub-concepts around
itself every 2 years. These new things added to it, like "patterns"
and ORM's, are supposed to fix prior problems with it, but just add
more. It's a marketer's dream: a self-perpetuating-problem-solution
cycle.
The IT industry has been had (at least for custom biz apps).
Thanks,
Shane
-T-
oop.ismad.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Retrieving unnecessary data
- From: Robert Martin
- Re: Retrieving unnecessary data
- References:
- Retrieving unnecessary data
- From: ShaneLM
- Re: Retrieving unnecessary data
- From: topmind
- Re: Retrieving unnecessary data
- From: ShaneLM
- Retrieving unnecessary data
- Prev by Date: all solution manual manual solution study guide
- Next by Date: Re: Retrieving unnecessary data
- Previous by thread: Re: Retrieving unnecessary data
- Next by thread: Re: Retrieving unnecessary data
- Index(es):