Re: Is OOP a Fad? (Re: Retrieving unnecessary data)
- From: Robert Martin <unclebob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:38:51 -0600
On 2008-02-19 12:25:54 -0600, topmind <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
It is NOT
the software engineers that necessarily lack rigor, it is the nature
of what is being modeled. The *domain* lacks rigor. We end up modeling
the *whims* of personalities of the likes of non-technical managers,
marketers, politicians, and users.
In such a rigor-less environment, where the structure of modules is hard to anticipate and dependencies string themselves willy-nilly accross the code base, I can see the benefit of a strong data-driven approach. I can also imagine that you have an increased need to manage the dependencies between source modules.
--
Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob) | email: unclebob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Object Mentor Inc. | blog: www.butunclebob.com
The Agile Transition Experts | web: www.objectmentor.com
800-338-6716 |
.
- References:
- Retrieving unnecessary data
- From: ShaneLM
- Re: Retrieving unnecessary data
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: Retrieving unnecessary data
- From: ShaneLM
- Re: Retrieving unnecessary data
- From: Patrick May
- Is OOP a Fad? (Re: Retrieving unnecessary data)
- From: topmind
- Re: Is OOP a Fad? (Re: Retrieving unnecessary data)
- From: andrew queisser
- Re: Is OOP a Fad? (Re: Retrieving unnecessary data)
- From: topmind
- Retrieving unnecessary data
- Prev by Date: Re: Retrieving unnecessary data
- Next by Date: Re: Retrieving unnecessary data
- Previous by thread: Re: Is OOP a Fad? (Re: Retrieving unnecessary data)
- Next by thread: Re: Retrieving unnecessary data
- Index(es):