Re: development of C++ compiler
- From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:52:42 +0100
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:59:08 -0800, Phlip wrote:
Your remaining checklist indicates C, in its current role as "portable,
well-defined, assembler"...
C is certainly non-portable, in particular because it is ill-defined. It is
also a quite poor intermediate language if "assembler" meant in this role.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: development of C++ compiler
- From: Phlip
- Re: development of C++ compiler
- References:
- development of C++ compiler
- From: Grizlyk
- Re: development of C++ compiler
- From: Phlip
- development of C++ compiler
- Prev by Date: Re: Why is Object Oriented so successfull
- Next by Date: Re: Retrieving unnecessary data
- Previous by thread: Re: development of C++ compiler
- Next by thread: Re: development of C++ compiler
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|