Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?
- From: Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:06:20 -0800 (PST)
On 27 Feb, 21:41, S Perryman <q...@xxxxx> wrote:
Daniel Pitts wrote:
Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:17:44 -0800 (PST), carofe wrote:
Which are the benefit of use XML to communicate components?
<snip>
To contrast : in telecoms, SIP is becoming the predominant protocol.
SIP is text-based etc, but does not impose hierarchic structure, nor need
<> all over the place.
Session Initiation Protocol? is that generally useful for transferring
data?
Do you have a good link?
--
Nick Keighley
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?
- From: S Perryman
- Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?
- References:
- Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?
- From: carofe
- Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?
- From: Daniel Pitts
- Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?
- From: S Perryman
- Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?
- Next by Date: Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?
- Next by thread: Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|