Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?

Nick Keighley wrote:

On 27 Feb, 21:41, S Perryman <q...@xxxxx> wrote:

OP>Which are the benefit of use XML to communicate components?

<snip>

To contrast : in telecoms, SIP is becoming the predominant protocol.
SIP is text-based etc, but does not impose hierarchic structure, nor need
<> all over the place.

Session Initiation Protocol? is that generally useful for transferring
data?

Not for the bulk data that enterprise systems produce.
But SIP is text-based, extensible etc. So something to compare/contrast
with the claims being made about XML.


Regards,
Steven Perryman
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SHSipPreference not working well on WM5 Pocket PC?
    ... > the SIP does not appear. ... >> your test application just put an edit control and see if it works. ... >> Regards, ... >> Rahul Thatte ...
    (microsoft.public.pocketpc.developer)
  • Re: wince.net 4.2 Auto SIP popup
    ... area so that things like start->run, file/folder rename don't pop up the ... Regards ... > I have the following problem: I want to avoid, that the Input Panel starts ... > the SIP to operate as it did in Wince 3.00 where you could call it up on ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsce.platbuilder)
  • Re: Aloe Vera
    ... Take a Mead and whisky to bed - sip any time you wake up - perfect;) ...
    (uk.rec.equestrian)
  • Re: SIP Password
    ... The draytek site is where I got the how I can do all you say in regards to ... But I have filled in the SIP Communications Service Connection Configuration ... But there was no SIP server. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.messenger)
  • Re: Why XML to comunicate Distributed Components?
    ... SIP is text-based etc, but does not impose hierarchic structure, nor need ... Session Initiation Protocol? ... is that generally useful for transferring ...
    (comp.object)