Re: Is Borland Compiler Suited for my Needs (Better than VC++)?
From: Corey Murtagh (emonk_at_slingshot.co.nz.no.uce)
Date: 10/10/03
- Next message: gswork: "Re: As programmers...have we come a long way since 1993?"
- Previous message: Corey Murtagh: "Re: Key Stroke Register"
- In reply to: CBFalconer: "Re: Is Borland Compiler Suited for my Needs (Better than VC++)?"
- Next in thread: goose: "Re: Is Borland Compiler Suited for my Needs (Better than VC++)?"
- Reply: goose: "Re: Is Borland Compiler Suited for my Needs (Better than VC++)?"
- Reply: CBFalconer: "Re: Is Borland Compiler Suited for my Needs (Better than VC++)?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:08:17 +1300
CBFalconer wrote:
> machine99 wrote:
>
> ... snip ...
>
>>I'll pay the full price when I get RICH!
>>
>>Until then it's JOLLY ROGER!
>
> You may want to sell something of yours someday. Why mess around
> with theft, when the equivalent software is available for the
> asking. gcc is probably as good as or better than either BC or
> VC.
Uh... no.
Ok, gcc may be a better /compiler/ on linux systems than BCB or VC++,
but as a development environment? I'll take BCB, thanks very much.
-- Corey Murtagh The Electric Monk "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur!"
- Next message: gswork: "Re: As programmers...have we come a long way since 1993?"
- Previous message: Corey Murtagh: "Re: Key Stroke Register"
- In reply to: CBFalconer: "Re: Is Borland Compiler Suited for my Needs (Better than VC++)?"
- Next in thread: goose: "Re: Is Borland Compiler Suited for my Needs (Better than VC++)?"
- Reply: goose: "Re: Is Borland Compiler Suited for my Needs (Better than VC++)?"
- Reply: CBFalconer: "Re: Is Borland Compiler Suited for my Needs (Better than VC++)?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
