Re: (!?) need fast algorithm for computing factorials
From: Richard Heathfield (dontmail_at_address.co.uk.invalid)
Date: 11/07/03
- Next message: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: Natural language programming?"
- Previous message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: help"
- In reply to: Sheldon Simms: "Re: (!?) need fast algorithm for computing factorials"
- Next in thread: Sheldon Simms: "Re: (!?) need fast algorithm for computing factorials"
- Reply: Sheldon Simms: "Re: (!?) need fast algorithm for computing factorials"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 21:01:25 +0000 (UTC)
Sheldon Simms wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 19:18:38 +0000, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>
>> f10000 < f10000.txt
>>
>> On my rather slow system, it completes in about 0.02 CPU seconds.
>
> This doesn't meet the OP's requirements. He wants to compute
> factorials _up to_ 10000!.
>
> If you would just supply the other 9999 configuration files please...
No need. Just divide that number by 10000, and then by 9999, and then by
9998...and so on! :-)
(BTW You probably noticed that I did actually give the OP a genuine hint
later in my article.)
-- Richard Heathfield : binary@eton.powernet.co.uk "Usenet is a strange place." - Dennis M Ritchie, 29 July 1999. C FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html K&R answers, C books, etc: http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton
- Next message: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: Natural language programming?"
- Previous message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: help"
- In reply to: Sheldon Simms: "Re: (!?) need fast algorithm for computing factorials"
- Next in thread: Sheldon Simms: "Re: (!?) need fast algorithm for computing factorials"
- Reply: Sheldon Simms: "Re: (!?) need fast algorithm for computing factorials"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]