Re: Programming Language Productivity: The Stupidity of Programmers
From: Richard Heathfield (dontmail_at_address.co.uk.invalid)
Date: 11/12/03
- Next message: James Rogers: "Re: Programming Language Productivity: The Stupidity of Programmers"
- Previous message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: MOST USEFUL Computer Language"
- In reply to: Muzzlebreak: "Re: Programming Language Productivity: The Stupidity of Programmers"
- Next in thread: Muzzlebreak: "Re: Programming Language Productivity: The Stupidity of Programmers"
- Reply: Muzzlebreak: "Re: Programming Language Productivity: The Stupidity of Programmers"
- Reply: Marshall Spight: "Re: Programming Language Productivity: The Stupidity of Programmers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 04:19:23 +0000 (UTC)
[followups set to comp.programming]
Muzzlebreak wrote:
> Corey Murtagh <emonk@slingshot.co.nz.no.uce> wrote in
> news:1068578455.161929@radsrv1.tranzpeer.net:
>
>> Muzzlebreak wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> What I don't like is Microsoft, constantly EXTENDING the C language
>>> into oblivion. When C++ came out, I thought, "What is this crap?"
<snip>
>>
>> Uh... Microsoft isn't even vaguely responsible for C++. They produced
>> a compiler for it, but the language itself evolved completely outside
>> their control.
>>
<snip>
>
> Yes, but when C++ first appeared, Microsoft's had the biggest libraries,
C++ first appeared (under that name) in 1983. I don't recall Microsoft
producing a C++ compiler until around 1992 or 1993. They certainly weren't
the first to produce an MS-DOS implementation of C++, let alone a Unix
version.
-- Richard Heathfield : binary@eton.powernet.co.uk "Usenet is a strange place." - Dennis M Ritchie, 29 July 1999. C FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html K&R answers, C books, etc: http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton
- Next message: James Rogers: "Re: Programming Language Productivity: The Stupidity of Programmers"
- Previous message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: MOST USEFUL Computer Language"
- In reply to: Muzzlebreak: "Re: Programming Language Productivity: The Stupidity of Programmers"
- Next in thread: Muzzlebreak: "Re: Programming Language Productivity: The Stupidity of Programmers"
- Reply: Muzzlebreak: "Re: Programming Language Productivity: The Stupidity of Programmers"
- Reply: Marshall Spight: "Re: Programming Language Productivity: The Stupidity of Programmers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|