Re: what are these langs?
From: L.J. Buitinck (L.J.Buitinck.spam_at_spam.student.rug.nl)
Date: 11/13/03
- Next message: Joachim Durchholz: "Re: Programming Language Productivity: The Stupidity of Programmers"
- Previous message: Joachim Durchholz: "Re: Programming Language Productivity: The Stupidity of Programmers"
- In reply to: Stefan Ljungstrand: "Re: what are these langs?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:41:44 +0100
Stefan Ljungstrand wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Tristan Miller wrote:
>
> Err, where I'm from, Haskell is a functional programming language.
>
> (Hmm, the logic programming language Mercury (intended as, sortof,
> statically typed successor/improvement for Prolog) also has functions, so
> I would count it as functional too. And they say that Lisp is multi-
> paradigm.)
Haskell is a functional programming language.
Prolog is an impure logic programming language (a procedural language
with logic programming features).
Lisp is a procedural programming language dressing up as a functional
one. not very successfully, IMHO, although Scheme does it better than
Common Lisp.
Mercury is a pure functional logic programming language.
I'm not sure much is happening around Mercury anymore...
-- Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti. Lars
- Next message: Joachim Durchholz: "Re: Programming Language Productivity: The Stupidity of Programmers"
- Previous message: Joachim Durchholz: "Re: Programming Language Productivity: The Stupidity of Programmers"
- In reply to: Stefan Ljungstrand: "Re: what are these langs?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|