Re: Programmer's unpaid overtime.
From: Richard Heathfield (dontmail_at_address.co.uk.invalid)
Date: 12/05/03
- Next message: Programmer Dude: "Re: Programmer's unpaid overtime."
- Previous message: CBFalconer: "Re: list manipulation"
- In reply to: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: Programmer's unpaid overtime."
- Next in thread: Programmer Dude: "Re: Programmer's unpaid overtime."
- Reply: Programmer Dude: "Re: Programmer's unpaid overtime."
- Reply: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: Programmer's unpaid overtime."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 20:09:10 +0000 (UTC)
Edward G. Nilges wrote:
> Corey Murtagh <emonk@slingshot.no.uce> wrote in message
> news:<1070543561.732831@radsrv1.tranzpeer.net>...
>
>> And of course let's not forget the fact that the methods used in the
>> code in question throw serious doubts on your vaunted computer science
>> knowledge. Your code was /abysmally/ broken. In fact it appeared to be
>> a horribly failed attempt to make C look bad by intentionally screwing
>> up the program.
>>
> Post the code you think backs up this ridiculous claim and tell us all
> why this is so. Thank you.
To save Corey and/or others digging through Google archives,
http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton/compprog/nilges.html contains the code in
question, together with my critique thereof.
-- Richard Heathfield : binary@eton.powernet.co.uk "Usenet is a strange place." - Dennis M Ritchie, 29 July 1999. C FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html K&R answers, C books, etc: http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton
- Next message: Programmer Dude: "Re: Programmer's unpaid overtime."
- Previous message: CBFalconer: "Re: list manipulation"
- In reply to: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: Programmer's unpaid overtime."
- Next in thread: Programmer Dude: "Re: Programmer's unpaid overtime."
- Reply: Programmer Dude: "Re: Programmer's unpaid overtime."
- Reply: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: Programmer's unpaid overtime."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|