Re: Letter to US Sen. Byron Dorgan re unpaid overtime

From: Randy Howard (randy.howard_at_FOOmegapathdslBAR.net)
Date: 12/24/03 

Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 16:03:01 -0600

In article <f5dda427.0312240546.6a52e9cc@posting.google.com>, spinoza1111
@yahoo.com says...
> We got Uncle Dan's to remove the display.

So you found someone that was more interested in money than their own
political convictions. Why does that not surprise me?

> We got Walgreen's in Deerfield to get rid of the GI Joe Easter Basket.

What a bizarre product offering. I suspect it would have gotten rid
of itself had you let normal economic forces run their course.

> And on Feb 15 millions of people showed Tony Blair and George Bush
> that they didn't agree with the war.

Hooah. Semper Fi.

> I'm sorry, but it's dollars to donuts that the enterprise systems
> which you build, if that's your business, are failures.

Clueless Wonder strikes again.

> This is no reflection on your professional capabilities

True, as no incorrect ASSumptions are a reflection on anything.

> between the fact that as programmers, programmers are workers who
> assert management control, which makes it impossible for managers to
> properly even acknowledge their existence.

You can't restrain yourself, can you? Why don't you just quote
the weather in Nome Alaska next time? It's just as useful.

> The disgusting barbarity if the above shows clearly that there is no
> fit whatsoever between the self-image of the group of posters who are
> participating in this session, and their actual personalities.

I would be happy to do precisely that if you don't believe me. I'll
play your plane fare, buy your hunting license, take you out in the
woods and duct-tape antlers on your head. What more could you require?
Just let me know when you'd like to try it. The only requirement is
that I can film it and you will sound a release form so it can be
published.

> This group is posing as scientific adults and is throwing around loose
> and half-understood terminology like O(n).

The only person having a problem understanding it is you, and you do not
even possess half of the concepts. I'd say you know it involves a
capital letter "O", and that's about it for your comprehension.

> consisting of nasty and devolved elements who smell, they think,
> blood.

I smell incompetence all the way from Evanston, coming through a TCP
connection. My wife just came in and asked what the stench was coming
off the monitor. I showed her your post, and she understood and went
away.

> > Correction, Clinton knew how to "do his business", but couldn't contain
> > the overspray effectively. Clinton screwed up in Iraq, and you bloody
> > well know it. I do appreciate your frank admission of your two-faced
> > response to actions based upon the party of the head crook in charge at
> > the time.
> >
> The reality has nothing whatsoever to do with programming. The reality
> is political.

How does your response have any bearing on the paragraph above it?
Clinton was forced to spew all over her dress because of political forces
beyond his control?
 
> > Searching for "congressional record" and "colleen rowley" "2001" on google
> > resulted in about 10 hits, although I couldn't find any that were a
> > definitive source. I found on mostly political websites that she
> > claimed that they knew about the attacks but didn't act. I found nothing
> > about limitations in the software. In fact, expanding to the search
> > to include "boolean" resulted in zero hits. Care to try again, or
> > specify a direct URL to your "evidence"?
> >
> No. Do your own homework. If you can't use a search engine, that's
> your problem.

You made the claim, it is your responsibility to prove it, otherwise
you're just a liar by default until you prove otherwise.

> > Do you have a random text generator that knows *some* aspects of
> > grammatical structure, or does crap like this really come from a
> > human head on its own?

No response. Evidently the software wasn't trained to know how to
respond to direct enquiries about its existence. 

-- 
Randy Howard            _o     
2reply remove FOOBAR    \<,    
______________________()/ ()______________________________________________
SCO Spam-magnet: postmaster@sco.com

Relevant Pages

  • If the desperate firms can taste consistently, the dual gravel may die more forests.
    ... Hardly any good yummy score refuses defeats beneath Roger's head ... up to swiss, at all rude reporters. ... respectable bed were geting in response to the lost post. ... considerably balance as the single ducks accord. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Speaker for DRRI
    ... I put the stock speaker back and it has much better over head and response. ... However it's take more than a 25 watt 12 F to take advantage of whatever the amp offers. ... in fact our Weber / Pro Reverb situation was the first I had experienced this first hand. ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)
  • Re: FreeTrack
    ... looking to the apex takes a large change of head angle, ... the response curve for each axis of movement. ... get no movement in POV while your head is near straight ahead. ... For serious racing I'd probably only use yaw and pitch ...
    (rec.autos.simulators)
  • Re: Firefox - replacing the whole page by the new one in Ajax response
    ... I would do the following if the result of the request is a full page: ... know what will be returned and analyze the response to act accordingly. ... because of IE - our head section contains references to external ... But it worked perfectly fine in Firefox, ...
    (comp.lang.javascript)
  • MEMO: to Drew Carey: Naomi Wolfe is exactly correct
    ... yourself to google the Guardian page and read it for yourself. ... to better talent because it is generally the liberal Fascism from the ... subjective reality instead of directly to existence, ... half full aspect in the naïve response, but it is the naïve response, ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
Loading