Re: PROFESSIONAL floating-point algorithms.
From: Corey Murtagh (emonk_at_slingshot.no.uce)
Date: 01/04/04
- Next message: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: Theodore Adorno, a prophet of data systems design"
- Previous message: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: To Richard Heathfield: enough's enough"
- In reply to: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: PROFESSIONAL floating-point algorithms."
- Next in thread: Willem: "Re: PROFESSIONAL floating-point algorithms."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 17:30:18 +1300
Edward G. Nilges wrote:
> Willem <willem@stack.nl> wrote in message news:<slrnbveh2g.2rai.willem@toad.stack.nl>...
>
>>Edward wrote:
>>)> Unfortunately, my last post was inundated by unprofessional
>>)> commentaries from small children who are not yet back at school.
>>)
>>) Mr. Wehner, I apologize to you on behalf of this newsgroup. ...
>>
>>As a member of this newsgroup, I do not acknowledge the right of Mr. Nilges
>
<snip childish BS>
>
>>to speak on the behalf of it, and I therefore disavow this apology.
>
> ....which unavoidablu means that you SUPPORT, and are on record as
> supportng, the unprofessional attacks on the OP, or you deny they
> exist, which is hard to do without urging the OP to consider this less
> a professional NG and more a hazing society.
Or perhaps he's just objecting to you putting words in the collective
mouths of everyone here.
It's funny, you know. You go on about morality while consistently
displaying almost total disregard for it.
> As a member of this newsgroup I would advise the OP not to piss
> Richard Heathfield off.
You persist in ascribing dark motives and evil conspiracies to Richard
with neither proof nor reason to back your statements. This appears to
be a feeble attempt to suck another poor soul into your web of delusions.
But I agree... don't piss Richard off. He's a nice guy, by and large,
and doesn't deserve it. I do invite the OP to check a few posts from
you and Richard and make his own mind up about that however.
>>The site in question may or may not contain valuable information, I don't
>>know, but it is plainly obvious that a number of people find that its
>>layout, especially the choice of colours, make it unfit for reading.
>
> This is a common error.
>
> You only have a right to speak on presentation style when you are
> competent to judge the quality of presentation.
Actually, there's this 'freedom of speech' thing that a number of people
subscribe to. You must be familiar with it eddie, since you exercise
that freedom to excess.
>>Mr Nilges., will you *please* stop posting your sociopolitical drivel and
>>thinly-veiled insults to this newsgroup ?
>
> Why? So you can intimidate constructive contributors and newbies?
No, because it is not relevant in this newsgroup. You've had that
explained to you on far too many occasions for me to keep track of, yet
you persist in not understanding. This leads to the inescapable
conclusion that you are incapable of truly rational thought.
How sad it is to be in your late 50s and losing your mind. I pity you
eddie.
-- Corey Murtagh The Electric Monk "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur!"
- Next message: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: Theodore Adorno, a prophet of data systems design"
- Previous message: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: To Richard Heathfield: enough's enough"
- In reply to: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: PROFESSIONAL floating-point algorithms."
- Next in thread: Willem: "Re: PROFESSIONAL floating-point algorithms."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
