Re: Dijkstra gets it wrong [was: Re: D gets it right]
From: Programmer Dude (Chris_at_Sonnack.com)
Date: 02/25/04
- Next message: Programmer Dude: "Re: test"
- Previous message: Willem: "Re: Patent source code?"
- In reply to: Joe \: "Re: Dijkstra gets it wrong [was: Re: D gets it right]"
- Next in thread: Michael Mendelsohn: "Re: Dijkstra gets it wrong [was: Re: D gets it right]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:52:42 -0600
Joe \"Nuke Me Xemu\" Foster wrote:
>> I have mixed feelings about [properties] sometimes. They're nice
>> syntactically, but it's also nice having it obvious when you're
>> using a method verses a variable.
>
> Only VB4 had "real" Public class member variables. VB5 and 6
> treat them as syntactic sugar for an (unnamed) Private variable
> plus a set of Public Property Get/Let/Set procedures.
Which illustrates the point beautifully. I had no idea that was
the case (although it does make sense when you consider how VB
works).
-- |_ CJSonnack <Chris@Sonnack.com> _____________| How's my programming? | |_ http://www.Sonnack.com/ ___________________| Call: 1-800-DEV-NULL | |_____________________________________________|_______________________|
- Next message: Programmer Dude: "Re: test"
- Previous message: Willem: "Re: Patent source code?"
- In reply to: Joe \: "Re: Dijkstra gets it wrong [was: Re: D gets it right]"
- Next in thread: Michael Mendelsohn: "Re: Dijkstra gets it wrong [was: Re: D gets it right]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|