Re: Philosphy of programming
From: Programmer Dude (Chris_at_Sonnack.com)
Date: 02/26/04
- Next message: Programmer Dude: "Re: GetAsyncKeyState problem, Help Please."
- Previous message: Darrell Grainger: "Re: program work with an existing program"
- In reply to: William D. Tallman: "Re: Philosphy of programming"
- Next in thread: William D. Tallman: "Re: Philosphy of programming"
- Reply: William D. Tallman: "Re: Philosphy of programming"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:57:21 -0600
"William D. Tallman" wrote:
>> *IS* reality really in the mind of the beholder, or does it
>> exist [as] an external object to behold?
>
> It's the internal representation that is the reality.
Ah, we disagree, then. (And because this part of things is not
hugely on topic, I'm going to skip a lot. Those more interested
in programming aspects can skip down to [Programming])
>> The point is that our perceptions are pretty awful.
>
> Actually our perceptions, within their limitations, are
> pretty good.
I'm afraid I don't agree with that, either. For example, law
enforcement people are quite familiar with what bad witnesses
people make--no two will "see" the same thing.
Also, per Quantumosity, NONE of us is perceiving anything like
what's really there, and it's *possible* we all perceive what
we do perceive differently.
>> Yet what we may have in common about a 'thing' is only the
>> shared, learned identification of that thing.
>
> Our perceptions are generated by our physical bodies, and so
> I think we can expect them to be much more similar than
> different.
I'm not sure I agree. The wiring of the brain grows uniquely
in each individual. The connections are different--although
similar. I'd say the jury is still out big time on just how
common our internal experience really is.
> The point is that there are several levels of reality extant,
> and we take some of them for granted.
I would say there is one reality--dimly and individually
perceived.
> All internal presentations of an environment are realities,
> even the fantasies,...
Reality == Fantasy ??
Hmmmmmm...... doesn't work for me. (-:
I understand what you're saying, but I prefer other terminology.
[Programming]
>> ...how do you tie any of this into programming?
>
> I presented my take on how we [create models] in our daily
> lives. In real life, we have an ongoing iterative process
> where we check and adjust on a continuous basis, or we gamble
> that we can do so periodically.
I think a difference is that a lot of that is subconscious.
Programming should be much more intentional. (Actually, come
to that, what we do in life should be more intentional.)
> How about applying these to programming. I think that
> perhaps the notion of creating a test for the code in
> parallel with the code itself is akin to the reality
> check we ordinarily do.
(If that check is as intentional as TDD requires.) Yes, I like
that idea. Good comparison.
> I think that having several different teams taking different
> approaches at different points has advantages. I
If one can afford the resources, yes excellent.
> So, a definition of programming might do well to speak to
> these views as well. Maybe programming is getting a computer
> to perform as desired, to produce what is wanted from it.
I sometimes tell people my job is "Training Silicon Lifeforms"!
> Maybe programming is writing computer programs, and
> all the rest of this is just common sense;...
That, too. I doubt we can derive a one-liner (or even a para)
that fully describes--let alone defines--programming.
-- |_ CJSonnack <Chris@Sonnack.com> _____________| How's my programming? | |_ http://www.Sonnack.com/ ___________________| Call: 1-800-DEV-NULL | |_____________________________________________|_______________________|
- Next message: Programmer Dude: "Re: GetAsyncKeyState problem, Help Please."
- Previous message: Darrell Grainger: "Re: program work with an existing program"
- In reply to: William D. Tallman: "Re: Philosphy of programming"
- Next in thread: William D. Tallman: "Re: Philosphy of programming"
- Reply: William D. Tallman: "Re: Philosphy of programming"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|