Re: future of programming languages
From: Programmer Dude (Chris_at_Sonnack.com)
Date: 03/31/04
- Next message: Daedalus: "Re: Liz laughs and laughs and laughs at Chuck Lysaght"
- Previous message: Ian Woods: "Re: GUI vs: CLI (was: Shell command in VB6)"
- In reply to: Malcolm: "Re: future of programming languages"
- Next in thread: Ian Woods: "Re: future of programming languages"
- Reply: Ian Woods: "Re: future of programming languages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:18:56 -0600
Malcolm wrote:
> A nervous system doesn't work like [a CPU]. [...]
> Nervous systems can do thing which it is very difficult to
> program computers to do, but are of real use away from the
> protected environment of pre-formatted input and defined
> output that most programs operate in.
On the other hand, computers rarely take an AK-47 to a bell tower....
Human brains have a *lot* of well known inefficiencies, spectacular
failure modes and problematic patterns of operation.
<reference type="Very Obscure">
Imagine if all computers acted like Bomb #20 in DARK STAR!
</reference>
-- |_ CJSonnack <Chris@Sonnack.com> _____________| How's my programming? | |_ http://www.Sonnack.com/ ___________________| Call: 1-800-DEV-NULL | |_____________________________________________|_______________________|
- Next message: Daedalus: "Re: Liz laughs and laughs and laughs at Chuck Lysaght"
- Previous message: Ian Woods: "Re: GUI vs: CLI (was: Shell command in VB6)"
- In reply to: Malcolm: "Re: future of programming languages"
- Next in thread: Ian Woods: "Re: future of programming languages"
- Reply: Ian Woods: "Re: future of programming languages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|