Re: What's the name for this?
From: Torkel Franzen (torkel_at_sm.luth.se)
Date: 05/01/04
- Next message: Karthik: "Re: Portable Makefiles for C++"
- Previous message: Mike Kent: "Re: My Experience as a "Non Gifted" Child"
- Next in thread: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: What's the name for this?"
- Maybe reply: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: What's the name for this?"
- Reply: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: What's the name for this?"
- Reply: Chris Sonnack: "Re: What's the name for this?"
- Maybe reply: Niklas Borson: "Re: What's the name for this?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 01 May 2004 05:48:59 +0200
Chris Sonnack <Chris@Sonnack.com> writes:
> Not as I understand it. The Philosophy of Intuitionism claims
> some truths are indefinable.
Who made this nonsensical assertion? Certainly not Brouwer.
- Next message: Karthik: "Re: Portable Makefiles for C++"
- Previous message: Mike Kent: "Re: My Experience as a "Non Gifted" Child"
- Next in thread: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: What's the name for this?"
- Maybe reply: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: What's the name for this?"
- Reply: Edward G. Nilges: "Re: What's the name for this?"
- Reply: Chris Sonnack: "Re: What's the name for this?"
- Maybe reply: Niklas Borson: "Re: What's the name for this?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
