Re: What a riot----July 1996 Computer Shopper

From: Randy Howard (randyhoward_at_FOOverizonBAR.net)
Date: 05/24/04


Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 02:12:46 GMT

In article <Ajbsc.8021$rb.7379@nwrdny03.gnilink.net>,
tgm2tothe10thpower@replacetextwithnumber.hotmail.com says...
> Which do you think (E or X) will survive in the long run? I'm betting
> E, but am just not sure.

I suspect both will be around for a while, at least in servers. I will
be surprised if PCI-X makes even a token appearance in desktops,
notebooks or low-end-workstations. However the ability to put graphics
adapters in PCI-E slots with much improved performance over 8X AGP
seems to imply that the gamers (and game programmers) will be clamoring
for PCI-E graphics cards ASAP.

> Seems to me that PCI-X is at least a tremendous boost if what you're
> interested in is keeping the existing card set already alive and well in
> the universe.

Nothing prevents people from using the "existing card set" in traditional
PCI slots. Heck, most people don't even have a 64-bit PCI slot in their
systems, much less a 64-bit adapter. Given that 32-bit gigabit ethernet
adapters are effectively clamped down to about half of their potential
throughput (easily demonstrable by comparing "real" GigE NICs in 64-bit
slots to the same nic in a 32-bit slot, or 32-bit NICs in either, I'm
somewhat surprised that more people haven't been whining about the lack
of 64-bit slots in most commodity board designs. I suspect it's because
most people don't drive enough load to care. It's only the server crowd
that really feels the pinch of slot performance typically.

Outside of a few SCSI RAID and SATA RAID controllers, and a fair number
of "server NICs for high-end usage, almost nobody is using (or even
making) PCI-X adapters.

-- 
Randy Howard    (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"The most amazing achievement of the computer software industry is its
continuing cancellation of the steady and staggering gains made by the
computer hardware industry..."   - Henry Petroski
      


Relevant Pages

  • Re: DR procedure per smallbizserver.net
    ... This should reveal the NICs you had before the disaster, ... Restart the box again in DSRM. ... Run the 'change server IP' wizard and put the server into a ... that has different network adapters, you must verify the IP address of each ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Urgent! New router and big disaster
    ... NIC, you need to specify an external DNS server for DNS, instead of the ... Both NICs should point to his internal IP for DNS. ... forward ports to it reliably in the router. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: CEICW fails at firewall config
    ... Do you or do you not have ISA 2000 or ISA 2004 installed on the SBS server? ... Do you have 2 NICs in the SBS? ... CEICW fails on firewall configuration every time. ... >>> Call to Creating the protected networks access rule returned ok. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Still cant connect to RWW or OWA remotely
    ... No Phantom NICs as far as I can see. ... that it can not find the server. ... Configure your Router as an Eithernet Bridge. ... Once you have this then configure the Routers Firewall and Port ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Still cant connect to RWW or OWA remotely
    ... No Phantom NICs as far as I can see. ... that it can not find the server. ... Configure your Router as an Eithernet Bridge. ... Once you have this then configure the Routers Firewall and Port ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)