Re: [OT] Top-Posting (was Re: wich is faster)
From: Programmer Dude (Chris_at_Sonnack.com)
Date: 05/28/04
- Next message: Programmer Dude: "Re: [OT] Forms and ideals"
- Previous message: Programmer Dude: "Re: From Plato to Nato: "Platonism" and programming"
- In reply to: Ben Measures: "[OT] Top-Posting (was Re: wich is faster)"
- Next in thread: Alan Balmer: "Re: [OT] Top-Posting (was Re: wich is faster)"
- Reply: Alan Balmer: "Re: [OT] Top-Posting (was Re: wich is faster)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 09:38:13 -0500
Ben Measures writes:
> The reason for not top posting is that your reply should refer to
> something that they wrote, preferably with something specific.
Programmers who can figure out cryptic manuals and navigate the
subtleties of code analysis.... are stymied by alternate posting
methods?
Tch, tch, tch. (-:
-- |_ CJSonnack <Chris@Sonnack.com> _____________| How's my programming? | |_ http://www.Sonnack.com/ ___________________| Call: 1-800-DEV-NULL | |_____________________________________________|_______________________|
- Next message: Programmer Dude: "Re: [OT] Forms and ideals"
- Previous message: Programmer Dude: "Re: From Plato to Nato: "Platonism" and programming"
- In reply to: Ben Measures: "[OT] Top-Posting (was Re: wich is faster)"
- Next in thread: Alan Balmer: "Re: [OT] Top-Posting (was Re: wich is faster)"
- Reply: Alan Balmer: "Re: [OT] Top-Posting (was Re: wich is faster)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
